![]() They want to know if your content fits their criteria, so focus solely on addressing that point. Listing people who might endorse your paper and discussing authors’ reputations do not interest editors. Avoid words such as “novel,” “first ever,” and “paradigm-changing.” These types of statements show bias and will make the editor question your ability to assess your work’s merits objectively. Don’t over-embellish your findings or their significance.Don’t use too much jargon or include too many acronyms.Other disclosures/statements required by the journal (e.g., compliance with ethical standards, conflicts of interest, agreement to terms of submission, copyright sign-over, etc.) What you should NOT do: If needed, reviewers to exclude (this information is most likely also requested elsewhere in online submissions forms).Potential reviewers and their contact information.Technical specialties required to evaluate your paper.Mention of any prior discussions with editor(s) (for example, if you discussed the topic with an editor at a conference).List of relevant works by you or your co-authors that have been previously published or are under consideration by other journals.Short list of similar articles previously published by the target journal.Statement that your paper has not been previously published and is not currently under consideration by another journal and that all authors have approved of and have agreed to submit the manuscript to this journal. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |